Post by messi05 on Jan 22, 2024 3:47:11 GMT -2
The attitude of the operator's employees. “The condition imposed by the defendant's agents was very cruel to the applicant, imposing the payment of 700 reais or the life of her son. In fact, at that moment, this was exactly the condition imposed, although not said in true words. I am convinced that no human being in a state of distress, wanting to save their child, deserves this treatment,” he said. Uber was ordered to compensate R$7,800 for material damage to a passenger who had his backpack stolen inside the car that was transporting him through the application created by the company.
In the decision, judge Arnoldo Assis Ribeiro Buy Phone Number List Junior, from the 5th Civil Jurisdictional Unit of Belo Horizonte (MG), said that the company assumed the risk by not properly monitoring the trip. “In view of the vulnerability of the consumer, as well as their natural lack of evidence, in contrast to the great technical apparatus that the technology company, which enables transport, has, it is up to them to ensure the safety of the passenger and their luggage”, he states in the ruling. reproduction Due to consumption and passenger insufficiency, Uber is responsible for stolen goods inside cars linked to its app.
reproduction The plaintiff, represented by lawyer Alexandre Oliveira e Rocha (of Toledo, Paoliello, Perpétuo, Pessoa and Cabral Advogados), filed a lawsuit against the company after his suitcase was stolen in São Paulo (SP), during the trip. He reported that, right at the start of the race, he had to get out of the car because a tire had gone flat. When he returned, the luggage was gone. Uber claimed there was a lack of evidence that the suitcase was in the vehicle. He also questioned the existence of civil liability due to the absence of the prerequisites for the duty to compensate, such as a defect in the provision of services, the damage and the causal link between them.
In the decision, judge Arnoldo Assis Ribeiro Buy Phone Number List Junior, from the 5th Civil Jurisdictional Unit of Belo Horizonte (MG), said that the company assumed the risk by not properly monitoring the trip. “In view of the vulnerability of the consumer, as well as their natural lack of evidence, in contrast to the great technical apparatus that the technology company, which enables transport, has, it is up to them to ensure the safety of the passenger and their luggage”, he states in the ruling. reproduction Due to consumption and passenger insufficiency, Uber is responsible for stolen goods inside cars linked to its app.
reproduction The plaintiff, represented by lawyer Alexandre Oliveira e Rocha (of Toledo, Paoliello, Perpétuo, Pessoa and Cabral Advogados), filed a lawsuit against the company after his suitcase was stolen in São Paulo (SP), during the trip. He reported that, right at the start of the race, he had to get out of the car because a tire had gone flat. When he returned, the luggage was gone. Uber claimed there was a lack of evidence that the suitcase was in the vehicle. He also questioned the existence of civil liability due to the absence of the prerequisites for the duty to compensate, such as a defect in the provision of services, the damage and the causal link between them.